The Ultimate Takedown: Elon Musk vs. Elizabeth Warren in the Dirtiest Tax Lie of the Century!
WASHINGTON D.C. — Senator Elizabeth Warren isn’t exactly renowned for her honesty. The woman formerly known as "Pocahontas"—now rebranded by President Trump as "Lie-A-Watha"—has been caught telling another humiliating whopper. This time, she is targeting Elon Musk and Tesla with a claim so easily debunked that even a Harvard professor should know better.
Warren took to social media to fib about Tesla paying "zero" in federal taxes, continuing her vendetta against the billionaire innovator. But as usual with Warren, the facts tell a very different story.
THE "ZERO TAX" LIE
Warren’s latest attack relies on a distortion of how corporate taxes actually work. While she screams about "zero taxes," the reality is that Tesla operated strictly within the bounds of current tax laws.
For years, Tesla struggled with profitability as it built the electric vehicle market from scratch. Under the tax code, companies can carry forward losses to offset future tax liabilities.
"How can one be expected to pay taxes on income that hasn’t been realized?" critics asked. "Naturally, Warren and other Democrats favor capital gains taxes on unrealized earnings, so they seem comfortable with imposing taxes on income that isn’t actually there, like good little socialists."
One user on X (formerly Twitter) summed it up perfectly: "She surely knows that, being a Harvard graduate. This was intent to mislead on her part. Or sheer stupidity."
A PATTERN OF DECEIT
This isn't the first time Warren has been caught peddling fiction. Her resume of recent lies is staggering:
-
The SAVE Act: Warren pushed the discredited claim that requiring proof of citizenship to vote would somehow "hinder women’s voting rights."
-
Affordability: She inaccurately blamed the Trump administration for the inflation crisis, a point Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent publicly destroyed in a recent hearing.
-
Air Traffic Control: She suggested Trump created "chaos" by dismissing air traffic controllers—a claim that lacks any factual basis.
THE EV HYPOCRISY
Voters with long memories might recall when Democrats like Warren were all-in on forcing Americans to buy electric vehicles. But the moment Elon Musk stopped towing the party line and embraced free speech, the narrative flipped.
"Gee – what changed?" one observer noted. Now, the very company Democrats once championed is "Public Enemy No. 1."
"TAXATION IS THEFT"
Warren’s obsession with taxing success highlights a deeper ideological rot. As she pushes for higher taxes on the wealthy, many Americans are waking up to the reality that our system is broken.
"Taxation is theft. Sorry – it just is," the report argues. "What used to be seen as a necessary evil has turned into outright theft for affluent Americans who are punished annually for the sin of ‘doing better’ and ‘achieving the American dream.’"
Warren knows she isn't being truthful. She knows we see through the lies. But as long as the media refuses to fact-check "Lie-A-Watha," the attacks on American success stories will continue.
AI Model Makes Stunning Prediction of 2028 Presidential Winner
An artificial intelligence model has generated a speculative forecast about the 2028 U.S. presidential election, despite official candidates not yet being known, drawing attention on social media and YouTube.
The forecast was produced using Grok, an AI chatbot developed by the company associated with Elon Musk, after a YouTube channel asked the system to simulate a likely outcome based on a set of hypothetical candidates. The simulation included state-by-state projections, an electoral map, and projected vote totals for chosen figures from both major parties.
As the host explains, “In this video, I asked Grok AI to predict the 2028 presidential election and give us a map forecast.”
In the end, Vance was predicted to take 312 electoral votes to Harris’ 212, according to the simulation; 270 are needed to win the presidency.
On the Democratic side, Kamala Harris currently holds the lead in early primary polling with 32 percent of the support, putting her ahead of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has 23.8 percent.
Former Biden Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is in third place, just shy of 10 percent, while Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro follow close behind.
The host notes that Harris’s resurgence may surprise some, given that “many people did write Kamala Harris off following her 2024 election defeat.”
Recent polling indicates that she is regaining her advantage. Additionally, the betting markets reflect this positive trend, now suggesting there’s a 56 percent chance she will seek the Democratic nomination in 2028, a significant rise from just 11.2 percent a few months back.
“Today, it is more likely than not that she is going to run again,” the video states.
On the Republican side, Vice President JD Vance leads early polling with 49.2 percent support, significantly ahead of Donald Trump Jr., who is trailing by 29 points. Senator Marco Rubio has 12.5 percent, while Florida Governor Ron DeSantis stands at 9.2 percent.
According to the simulation, Vance is the clear favorite for the GOP nomination, with a 46 percent chance of becoming the party’s standard-bearer. Rubio follows with an 18 percent chance.
The host notes: “If nothing big changes, he will very likely become the party’s nominee in the next presidential race.”
Grok’s simulation begins by defining “solid” states as those with a margin of 15 points or more. Vance’s solid column includes the following states: Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, most of Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, Indiana, South Carolina, and Ohio.
The inclusion of Ohio marks a significant shift; once a key battleground, the state has trended sharply to the right, Newsner noted.
“It is not difficult to see that he will carry the Buckeye State by a solid 15-point margin,” particularly following Donald Trump’s double-digit win there in 2024, the host said in the video.
Harris’s group of solid states mirrors much of her 2024 coalition, showing some modest gains. She is projected to win the states of Washington, California, Hawaii, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Maine’s first congressional district by at least 15 points. Notably, the model predicts that Connecticut and Delaware will return to solid Democratic margins after experiencing narrower results in 2020.
After accounting for solid states, Vance leads with 139 electoral votes to 108. Additionally, the “likely” category, which contains margins between 5 and 15 points, further enhances his advantage.
He is projected to win in Iowa, North Carolina, Florida, Texas, Arizona, Alaska, and Maine’s second district.
Florida and Texas are viewed as firmly Republican due to recent gains by the party, while Arizona, which was narrowly won by Trump in 2024, is expected to remain in Republican hands. With these solidly Republican and likely states counted, Vance would secure 246 electoral votes, leaving him just 24 votes short of the 270 needed to win.
In the end, Vance is expected to take 312 electoral votes to Harris’ 212, according to the simulation; 270 are needed to win the presidency.
WATCH:
